Cyanide Analysis - Analyze More Samples in Less Time, at Lower Cost, With Better Data!

Introductionion. Once the cyanide ion is trapped in the absorber
Each time you distill samples for cyanide analysis, yousolution it can be analyzed by any one of the
are wasting your time and money. OIA 1677 and OIAdeterminative steps to quantitate cyanide in solution.
1678 provide more precise and accurate cyanideNote that the procedure described is not really a
analysis data using automated gas-diffusiondistillation. Instead, it is boiling the sample in sulfuric
amperometry, while decreasing cyanide interferences.acid, condensing the steam back into the sample, and
OIA1677 is EPA approved for available cyanide incollecting all gases created (including the HCN) in a
wastewater, and for free cyanide in drinking water. Adilute sodium hydroxide solution. The cyanide
new methods, ASTM D7511-09 (or OIA1678) isrecovered by this process, in interference free
currently proposed for nationwide use for Cleansamples, has been defined as "total cyanide."
Water Act compliance. This method will appear in aThe predominant determination step is pyridine
Federal Register notice sometime later this year.barbituric acid colorimetry. While some methods (EPA
Cyanide is a widely used chemical that is found in335.4) use automation for the measurement, the
many other industries than the mining that it is mostsample preparation still requires manual processing,
commonly associated with. These industries need towhich requires manual labor. It is this manual
analyze cyanide in their process streams andprocessing that limits the number of samples your lab
wastewater, and their matrices will have othercan analyze per day. It is the manual processing that
constituents that interfere with cyanide distillations.increases the cost of each sample. You may spend
We could continue with status quo and analyze as itstens of thousands of dollars on an auto analyzer, but
always been done, or we could begin to be moreif you are still distilling manually, you are not realizing
concerned about the data generated, and lessthe full benefits of that automation.
concerned about continued use of methodology thatMost EPA approved cyanide methods utilize
has been proven to not work.automated equipment following a manual distillation
Analysis of Cyanide in Drinking Waterstep. This preliminary distillation is not only causing
Did you know that OIA1677 has been approved foryour reported results to be questionable, but is also
SDWA compliance reporting since March 2007? Don'tcosting you money. You can, by demonstrating that
feel bad, not many people do. One of the reasons isyour samples contain interferences, use an alternative
a common misconception that drinking water isprocedure, such as ASTM D7511, to overcome those
regulated for total cyanide. The regulated parameterinterferences. This non-distillation alternative will raise
for SDWA compliance is free cyanide as defined byyour confidence in your results and greatly improve
the CATC method, or by OIA 1677-DW. Anotherthroughput while lowering cost.
reason is, essentially, tradition. Before OIA1677EPA has proposed ASTM D7511 for inclusion in the
existed there were no methods capable of runningnext method update rule. ASTM D7511 is the same
free cyanide directly.method as OIA1678. This, formerly proprietary
Instead the CATC method was used. CATC is amethod, was handed to the ASTM allowing members
two-step, and very time consuming method. Theof the ASTM D19.06 committee to revalidate the
general consensus came that if you "screen" amethod and generate data in their own matrices
sample for total cyanide and it is not detected thereconfirming its claims. The method was validated by
is no reason to run CATC. If, and only if, totalan inter-laboratory study on 9 very complex matrices
cyanide is detected would you continue with thetaken from the industrial effluents known to contain
CATC and report that result. OIA 1677 eliminates thecyanide and its interferences. It is my opinion that
requirement for distillation and analyzes SDWAthis method is the most validated of any of the
compliant free cyanide without distillation. OIA 1677cyanide methods in use today. For instance, EPA
allows you to obtain results in minutes, not hours.335.4 was validated on deionized water samples
Many labs use direct colorimetry to measure freespiked with potassium cyanide. No other method,
cyanide, however, we have presented data provingother than OIA1677 has been challenged with as
that direct colorimetry is ineffective in real worldmany interferences or metal cyanide species.
samples.Conclusion
Analysis of Total Cyanide in WastewaterASTM D7511 is almost identical to OIA1677 and/or
The most common cyanide measurement is totalASTM D6888. A UV digester inserted in the path
cyanide. The most common technique, calledirradiates the acidified sample solution liberating total
distillation,involves a prolonged boiling of the sample incyanide, which then enters the 1677 device. Gas
strong acid solution while purging with air. Thesediffusion accomplishes the same task as distillation but
conditions liberate cyanide ion from metal cyanidewithout the complexity. This method does not
complexes, convert the cyanide ion to hydrogenrequire pyridine barbituric acid or chloramine T. Color
cyanide gas, and strip the hydrogen cyanide gasor turbidity does not interfere. This method that
from solution. The purge gas carries the HCN to aeliminates distillation also eliminates numerous
basic absorber solution that traps it as the cyanideinterferences giving you better data.